Sure, you know the obvious words to avoid using around the office, such as “&*(%^%$*“, “*(&*^&%$” and “%$$*^#@“. But do you know the more subtle words and phrases that might also be damaging your image at work? Yahoo! Hot Jobs recently posted “The Worst Words to Say at Work” that lists nine common words and phrases that will make you sound noncommittal, undependable, and untrustworthy to the people you work with every day.
Here’s our favorite part of the article:
Projects depend on everyone doing his or her part. People who use “if” are usually playing the blame game and betting against themselves. They like to set conditions, rather than assuming a successful outcome. People who rely on conditional responses are fortifying themselves against potential failure. They will say, “If Bob finishes his part, then I can do my part.” They’re laying the groundwork for a “no fault” excuse and for not finishing their work.
There are always alternatives, other routes, and ways to get the job done. Excuse makers usually have the energy of a slug and the spine of a jellyfish. You don’t want them on your team when you’re trying to climb Mt. Everest.
The article was actually an excerpt from Surviving the Toxic Workplace (McGraw-Hill, 2010), by Linnda Durre, a psychotherapist, business consultant, and columnist. You can follow her on Twitter: @LinndaDurreShow.
Tags: Employee Relations, manager-employee relations, office behavior, office etiquette, office relationships, what not to say at work, Yahoo! Hot Jobs

Uh, where’s the shiftiness and hard-to-pin down communication here?
The problem with throwing “if” into a plan is when it’s done merely to give an easy out before anything has even been implemented. It’s a cover-my-butt clause. The focus isn’t on the success of the program, outcome or even the company, it’s on making sure individuals are not accountable for anything that might possibly go wrong. Show some confidence in yourself and your work! When you offer good, well-thought-out ideas and put your best effort and energy into them, a good manager and a good company will not penalize you if things don’t pan out quite like everyone hoped they would. If you are working for people who don’t know the difference between good work and work that is shrouded in no-fault pre-qualifiers, well then, you have bigger issues to deal with than semantics.